Use of digital technologies to optimize investigative actions at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings
| dc.contributor.author | Pishchenko, Gennady | |
| dc.contributor.author | Puhach, Anatolii | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kravchuk, Ivan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kostiukevych, Oleksandr | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsymbal, Petro | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-15T13:55:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-15T13:55:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The relevance of the study was determined by the need for regulatory and legal incorporation of digital technologies at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedingsThe aim of the study is to substantiate the indicator-based and model-based verification of digital technologies relevant to procedural integration at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, taking into account regulatory traceability, evidentiary relevance, and legal incorporation. Research methods: legal analysis of norms and regulations, topological classification of digital technologies, formalization of the optimal case, indicator-based and model-based verification, legal modelling. The study carried out indicator-based and legal stratification of digital technologies at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. It was established that Digital Forensics, AI, Biometrics, e-Evidence Exchange and Video Conferencing demonstrate the highest institutionalization, regulatory incorporation and evidentiary validity. Indicator-based modelling (∆TPI, DEQ, PII, EII, UAE, DJC) confirmed their legal compliance and procedural efficiency. The highest level of regulatory integration (4 out of 5 categories) was established for Digital Forensics, Biometrics, e-Evidence Exchange, and Video Conferencing technologies. Instead, Blockchain and Digital Twin/3D were identified as auxiliary, as they require additional legal explicability and ethical unification. Empirical analysis of the functional adaptability of technologies in a real investigative process is of particular importance. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pishchenko, G., Puhach, A., Kravchuk, I., Kostiukevych, O., & Tsymbal, P. (2026). Use of digital technologies to optimize investigative actions at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 31, 132-152. https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1443/662 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1443/662 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.e-u.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1893 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | Criminal Justice | |
| dc.subject | Democratic Rights | |
| dc.subject | Human Rights | |
| dc.subject | Indigenous Rights | |
| dc.subject | Institutional Governance | |
| dc.subject | Rule of Law | |
| dc.subject | Social Justice | |
| dc.title | Use of digital technologies to optimize investigative actions at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings | |
| dc.type | Article |
Файли
Контейнер файлів
1 - 1 з 1
Ліцензійна угода
1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
- Назва:
- license.txt
- Розмір:
- 1.71 KB
- Формат:
- Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
- Опис: